There are many compelling cases of children who recall past lives. They are able to provide such convincing accounts and details of events that are not easy to dismiss. One such case is that of James Leininger, a young American boy who had nightmares of being trapped in a burning plane that was crashing into the sea. Between the ages of two and five, he named aircraft types, a ship called Natoma, a pilot friend, and identified himself as ‘James’. Details of his memories were later linked to World War 2 aviator James Huston Jr. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of other such examples, in which typically young children are able to recall incredible details about past lives they surely could not have led. 

Usually, these are dismissed as autosuggestion or the product of subliminal messaging. Flights of fancy, as they used to call an overactive imagination. In my experience of working with young children, they are simply not capable of constructing such elaborate myths and sustaining lies to so many people, for so long, so convincingly. Perhaps child psychologists may disagree with me. 

Beyond recounting and checking details, it’s difficult to provide any hard evidence for these stories, but a piece of research by neuroscientists Peter Jonas and Victor Vargas-Barroso of the Institute of Science and Technology Austria (ISTA) holds some intriguing possibilities. Most of us think of our brains as being relatively empty upon birth; neurons and networks of memories growing and developing as we age and encounter new experiences. We certainly don’t think of them being the other way around— packed full of neurons that hone and alter themselves as we grow, but that is exactly what the researchers found. In their work, they discovered that brains (in mice at least) do not start out as empty slates, waiting to be filled up as they make their way through life, but rather they are born full, and they pare down circuits upon experience as they age. The researchers specifically looked at region CA3 in the hippocampus, which has a specific role in memory. 

Now, it’s important to stress that the researchers were not stating that brains are full of tangible memories on birth; they are saying that the neurons that create and store memories are densely packed when we leave the womb. Nevertheless, it seems as though the mechanisms to enable complex memory storage are present in newborn babies, which is itself quite incredible. 

If, as some scientific hypotheses hold, consciousness arises from a dynamic electromagnetic field, it may just be possible for consciousness to exist outside the body. Some research on out-of-body experiences suggests it might. Perhaps it is possible then that memories might just transfer from person to person. This is pure speculation of course, but it may just explain the fascinating phenomenon of children who remember past lives. Maybe, just maybe, they were born with them.

Sources:

Popular Mechanics – the brain is not empty at birth

Neuroscience News Hippocampus brain development

Frontiers in science journal 

Popular Mechanics – out-of-body experiences

Child development and behaviours

YouTube – 5 children who remember past lives

Paul Carney Avatar

Published by

6 responses to “Remembering past lives”

  1. Author Emmanuel Avatar

    True, past life is real and but only the bad incident can be remembered easily

  2. David Pearce Music Reviewer Avatar

    What I don’t understand is why so few children ‘remember’ these past lives. It’s why I wonder about these events. I was fascinated by these stories as a kid but I never knew anyone who ever claimed a past life. It was a post that reminded me of my early belief in supernatural phenomena.

    1. Paul Carney Avatar

      Yes I used to be drawn to supernatural things as a young boy. Maybe I’m going round in a full circle as I get older! Thanks for commenting David hope you are well 👏🙏

  3. Steps Of Purpose Avatar

    This is really fascinating to think about, especially the way children can describe details that feel far beyond their years. Even if you approach it cautiously, it does raise interesting questions about memory, consciousness, and what we still don’t fully understand about the mind.
    At the same time, I find myself holding the tension between curiosity and caution because some of these interpretations move quickly from observed cases into big philosophical conclusions that are still very debated scientifically. But it’s definitely the kind of topic that makes you pause and reflect on how much we don’t know yet.

    1. Paul Carney Avatar

      Thank you for your comment. Yes, I did try to frame it as speculative. There’s much we don’t know and it’s good to keep an open mind.

  4. zumpoems Avatar

    Yes, this is one possible explanation that is over looked. There are a multitude of possible explanations including the most common one. None should be eliminated until this is better underetood.

It would be great to hear your thoughts about this