Dogs or cats?

Fried rice or Ricin?

Whipped or whipped cream? 

Galantine or Guillotine? 

Croissants or crucifixion? 

Water melon or waterboarding? 

A false dichotomy is a fallacy based on an “either-or” type of argument. Two choices are presented, when more might exist – or one is acceptable and the other is not.

Very often, false dichotomies are used in questionnaires, or surveys, and even sometimes politically, to force people into choices they don’t want to make. A housing developer once surveyed our local area asking: where do you think it would be better to place the new road? To the east side of the development or to the west? False dichotomies are clever ways of manipulating us. They make us choose between things we shouldn’t have to choose between. A better way of phrasing today’s prompt is not dogs or cats? but, pets or no pets?

Paul Carney Avatar

Published by

3 responses to “False dichotomies”

  1. Robin King Avatar

    Thank you for this! Recently I gave feedback in a survey rel to a new TV series. The final question was “How do you feel about these surveys?” (I’ve taken many for them.) After a couple of years’ frustration with their suspiciously structured questions I finally told them that I was flummoxed by the choices that aren’t really choices at all. Manipulative, yes! Probably won’t get anymore surveys from them…
    Anyway: ❤️ this post. When I finish prepping my site (& begin visiting people again) I’ll stop back & read more of your blog. ::waves::

    1. Robin King Avatar

      Whoops! Typo: “anymore” should read “any more.” 🤷‍♀️

    2. Paul Carney Avatar

      Thank you so much for stopping by Robyn and thanks for the insightful comment

Leave a reply to Paul Carney Cancel reply